Said It Here

Why do job interviews require weeks of free take-home work?

Senior roles often demand extensive, multi-week take-home assessments and endless interview hoops that leave candidates feeling exploited for free labor instead of valued. This excessive time commitment creates an exhausting hurdle, especially for professionals already working full-time jobs.

What people tried

Every workaround mentioned in the threads below. We haven’t tested any of them — and nobody here is claiming they worked.

  1. 1
    Setting strict boundaries to refuse tests that look like production problem-solving
  2. 2
    Writing a rejection to the employer
  3. 3
    Negotiating timeframes or questioning requirements directly before starting
  4. 4
    Dealing with the time commitments using spare time while unemployed

In their words

Unedited, grouped by where they were said, most upvoted first within each place, each linked to the thread it came from.

r/Accounting1 person · September 2026

30 min interview with the manager 2 hour interview with controller and CFO (1 hr each) Excel assessment test Formal meeting with the Presidentsource ↗

This is all for a STAFF ACCOUNTANT position. These companies want someone knowing everything already and it’s so many hoops to jump through just to make it to the end.source ↗

I can only imagine going through this process while having an in-office job.source ↗

js35796 · r/Accounting · 18 upvotes
The Workplace Stack Exchange1 person · October 2025

By looking at the requirements, I said this assessment will take approximately 3 weeks, they said OK.source ↗

The whole point about it, is that I already did the 3 weeks assessment. I made something which is really state-of-the-art. But now, it left me with a bad feeling. I should be happy about it, but I'm not.source ↗

I seriously want to write them a rejection because of the possibility for the free work exploit.source ↗

Julian · The Workplace Stack Exchange · 16 upvotes

Where this came up

People with this problem also raised