How to push back against forced AI tools at work
Employees are being pressured by leadership to adopt unreliable AI tools that introduce severe security risks and create endless clean-up work for existing staff. This makes it impossible to maintain normal workflows or prevent constant technical disruptions.
What the numbers show
Counted from the threads quoted below. How we count
- Most of it landed at once — the busiest month was October 2026, with 12 people.
- This comes up 47.9× more often in r/Netsuite than across the site as a whole.
What people tried
Every workaround mentioned in the threads below. We haven’t tested any of them — and nobody here is claiming they worked.
Found another way around this?
Share your steps and trade-offs so fellow engineers don't have to reinvent the wheel. No account required.
- 1correcting AI-generated errors manuallyDid this help you?
- 2managing increased support and infrastructure requests caused by users relying on AI toolsDid this help you?
- 3Preparing probing questions to challenge administratorsDid this help you?
- 4Gathering research and arguments used by other countries or school systemsDid this help you?
- 5Focusing on teaching children fundamentals and verification skills at home insteadDid this help you?
- 6Ignoring the push, using AI locally for personal experiments, or selectively choosing when to use AI tools.Did this help you?
- 7Checking both the desktop site and mobile app to see if the old feature remains availableDid this help you?
- 8Searching for the feature elsewhere on the platform in case it was relocatedDid this help you?
- 9Use ClaudeDid this help you?
- 10Build connectorsDid this help you?
- 11Switch between models in most chat interfacesDid this help you?
- 12Use Cowork to perform multi-step tasksDid this help you?
- 13Treating AI as a junior coworker whose output must be manually audited and verified.Did this help you?
- 14Building custom tools on personal AI subscriptions at home and transferring them to work via flash drives.Did this help you?
- 15Developing specific prompting strategies and referencing restricted spreadsheet areas to prevent unwanted edits.Did this help you?
- 16Using the existing standard software UI instead of AI toolsDid this help you?
- 17Building custom AI automations independently using external LLMs like ClaudeDid this help you?
- 18Keeping expectations low and planning to migrate off the platform entirelyDid this help you?
In their words
Unedited, grouped by where they were said, most upvoted first within each place, each linked to the thread it came from.
“its being forced down our throat by the CEO, we have one solo "vibe coder" dev doing all the work internal because we can't afford market rates, half our staff were already offshored, and I'm expected to assist with every hiccup they encounter and basically give full admin permissions to anything”source ↗
“I've had to correct him 50+ times already from AI hallucinated permission requests and he had the gall to send me a Claude response of permissions he needed with the text "Do you understand what you're reading?"”source ↗
“I hate that's its been pushed on everyone and everything rather than just be treated as an experimental technology.”source ↗
“The main problem: it fucking sucks”source ↗
“It's somehow worse tham bing for answering questions.”source ↗
“I would like the outcome to be “0% AI is the right amount but I expect that to be somewhat of an uphill battle.”source ↗
“I’m not trying to open a discussion here on why or why not, I’m asking for suggestions on how to constructively argue the “why not”.”source ↗
“I went to the "Product Launchpad" in the Expo to ask a few questions regarding the "AI Portlet". I was observing a walkthrough, and the NS Product guy got to the point of clicking a button to act on AI-recommended "Item Demand Insights". After pressing the button, the AI took about a minute (only a second in the Keynote demo). Then it generated an error saying it "couldn't complete the request".”source ↗
“I was not impressed at all. I don’t want 25 more half baked ai features. I want 2-3 solid ai features that work as described. No more pipe dreams.”source ↗
“Saw a demo some guy said show me how many open orders for x item, after 3 minutes of loading and thinking the guy said I could just got use the UI for this still right?”source ↗
“I am 40 kids over my normal limit. I just walked in to find out that my room was flooded. Our Dean has a giant AI poster of himself in his office. Yeah, it's bad.”source ↗
“The amount of AI slop used by admin is…concerning.”source ↗
“i don't have a single class I like this year.”source ↗
“The amount of new data trackers created by ai coming out of our admin is very concerning.”source ↗
“someone suggested i use it to allocate costs recently and it worked for maybe... half of what I wanted it to do. Then it overwrote 2 columns of xlookups I had going with its own text when I never asked it to.”source ↗
“I wish Copilot was correct when I ask it a complicated accounting treatment or tax problem. It would save me the headache of working it out myself.”source ↗
“It saves us 0 time because we dont even use the AI OCR feature, but it is a built in feature of the service that cant be avoided.”source ↗
Where this came up
People with this problem also raised
- 7Where can I find real-world company AI policies and best practices?
- 7How to let AI update CRM data without breaking hidden workflows
- 3Why does AI give different answers or write bloated essays?
- 25Why am I being forced to use AI at work?
- 44How to deal with all the low effort AI content online
- 2Why is rushed custom software so insecure?