Said It Here

How to push back against forced AI tools at work

Employees are being pressured by leadership to adopt unreliable AI tools that introduce severe security risks and create endless clean-up work for existing staff. This makes it impossible to maintain normal workflows or prevent constant technical disruptions.

What people tried

Every workaround mentioned in the threads below. We haven’t tested any of them — and nobody here is claiming they worked.

  1. 1
    correcting AI-generated errors manually
  2. 2
    managing increased support and infrastructure requests caused by users relying on AI tools
  3. 3
    Preparing probing questions to challenge administrators
  4. 4
    Gathering research and arguments used by other countries or school systems
  5. 5
    Focusing on teaching children fundamentals and verification skills at home instead

In their words

Unedited, most upvoted first, each linked to the thread it came from.

its being forced down our throat by the CEO, we have one solo "vibe coder" dev doing all the work internal because we can't afford market rates, half our staff were already offshored, and I'm expected to assist with every hiccup they encounter and basically give full admin permissions to anythingsource ↗

bigbadrune · r/sysadmin · 198 upvotes

I've had to correct him 50+ times already from AI hallucinated permission requests and he had the gall to send me a Claude response of permissions he needed with the text "Do you understand what you're reading?"source ↗

bigbadrune · r/sysadmin · 81 upvotes

I would like the outcome to be “0% AI is the right amount but I expect that to be somewhat of an uphill battle.source ↗

I’m not trying to open a discussion here on why or why not, I’m asking for suggestions on how to constructively argue the “why not”.source ↗

shizwizzle · r/Parenting · 45 upvotes

Where this came up

People with this problem also raised