Said It Here

Can apartments charge for priming and bathroom reglaze after move out?

Landlords are charging departing tenants for normal maintenance like priming and bathroom reglazing, labeling them as damages rather than normal wear and tear. This leaves renters questioning whether they are legally required to pay for these steep repair and replacement costs.

What people tried

Every workaround mentioned in the threads below. We haven’t tested any of them — and nobody here is claiming they worked.

  1. 1
    Disputing the charges with the landlord
  2. 2
    Asking for photographic evidence of the alleged damages
  3. 3
    Arguing that items like bathroom reglazing have exceeded their useful life
  4. 4
    Trying to source expensive or rare replacement parts online
  5. 5
    Consulting electricians or online forums to determine the actual cause of damage and contest liability

In their words

Unedited, grouped by where they were said, most upvoted first within each place, each linked to the thread it came from.

r/askanelectrician1 person · October 2026

“Informed me that in case electrician determines this is my fault, I will have to pay for a substitution **and** the installation.”source ↗

“There are no repair parts, nor a lot of these on the market.”source ↗

Complete-Ambition-83 · r/askanelectrician · 3 upvotes
r/moving1 person · October 2026

“We recently moved out and they are charging us for "priming" and "bathroom reglaze." We have no damages and they are saying it is not normal wear and tear. Is this a valid charge or should we dispute?”source ↗

Ok-Wear-1336 · r/moving · 3 upvotes

Where this came up

People with this problem also raised