Said It Here

Client disputing billing terms and rates after receiving the invoice

Clients attempt to unilaterally alter payment structures — such as retroactively demanding hourly rates instead of agreed daily rates or imposing self-created payment discounts — after project completion. This unexpected shift traps service providers into protracted negotiations over already-finalized compensation terms and delays payment.

What people tried

Every workaround mentioned in the threads below. We haven’t tested any of them — and nobody here is claiming they worked.

  1. 1
    switching to an hourly rate
  2. 2
    demanding a signed contract before doing further work
  3. 3
    considering value-based pricing instead of hourly
  4. 4
    setting specific scheduled days rather than open-ended availability
  5. 5
    Billing strictly upon receipt to avoid tracking complexities
  6. 6
    Evaluating whether the discount makes sense based on existing invoicing terms like net 60

In their words

Unedited, most upvoted first, each linked to the thread it came from.

Client wants to switch from daily billing to hourly billing after receiving the invoicesource ↗

Last Friday I sent the february invoice, and I received a long email this afternoon saying that daily billing wasn't appropriate or "fair"source ↗

LemonTart-12 · r/freelance · 117 upvotes

Heard from a client that "as a preferred vendor" they are offering themselves a 3% discount to pay me in 15 days, a 2% discount to pay me in 30 days, or zero discount to pay me in 60 days.source ↗

Anyone else encounter this?source ↗

Snoo_35864 · r/smallbusiness · 45 upvotes

Where this came up

People with this problem also raised