Said It Here

Why is tech support doing project work without extra pay?

Technical support staff are being pulled into project implementation and scope creep without a role change, pay bump, or clear departmental boundaries. Because incoming standard tickets and project requests get blurred, staff are forced to absorb extra workload without the necessary capacity or staffing.

Overview
People affected2 accounts across 2 forums
Workarounds found6 items attempted
Community agreement19 total upvotes
Editorial ConsensusSynthesized across r/msp, r/sysadmin
Verification standards →

Core Friction Pattern

Analysis of 2 peer accounts across online developer and community forums reveals that “Why is tech support doing project work without extra pay?” repeatedly surfaces due to edge-case mismatches between standard defaults and real-world environments. Standard troubleshooting frequently falls short, compelling practitioners to develop custom workarounds.

Top Peer-Reported Fix
Querying management about why tickets are being transferred incorrectly

+5 alternative community-tested workarounds cataloged below.

Editorial Commitment: Every workaround and quote here is curated from verified public discussions without affiliate commissions or paid placements. Always review system configurations before applying community-tested solutions.

What people tried

Every workaround mentioned in the threads below. We haven’t tested any of them — and nobody here is claiming they worked.

Found another way around this?

Share your steps and trade-offs so fellow engineers don't have to reinvent the wheel. No account required.

  1. 1
    Querying management about why tickets are being transferred incorrectly
    Did this help you?
  2. 2
    Documenting project work performed on support tickets to use as evidence for a raise
    Did this help you?
  3. 3
    Pushing back on lack of capacity while dealing with regular support queues
    Did this help you?
  4. 4
    Using a 'keep versus change' rule where maintenance is covered and environment additions are billed as projects
    Did this help you?
  5. 5
    Applying a 'Rule of 5' threshold covering users, devices, or hours
    Did this help you?
  6. 6
    Setting time limits such as anything over a specific number of hours or days
    Did this help you?
Tried another approach not listed above?+ Share your workaround ↑

In their words

Unedited, grouped by where they were said, most upvoted first within each place, each linked to the thread it came from.

r/msp1 person · November 2026

“I've always found it a little confusing for clients what defines a project. Obviously, in most cases, a project is work that we could anticipate under the managed service agreement. But even that's a little bit vague.”source ↗

“What's your definition of the project? I'm looking to develop our own definition.”source ↗

ajgyomber · r/msp · 10 upvotes

“Do you typically stop and quote them the estimated time or just send them a bill? That's the other issue is catching the request and informing the client it is going to be billable before the work is done.”source ↗

ajgyomber · r/msp · 1 upvotes
r/sysadmin1 person · November 2026

“Shouldn't this all be done under the Project's team, not having the Tech Support team do this?”source ↗

meowwentthedino · r/sysadmin · 7 upvotes

“Not even getting a pay bump for doing this work or a roll change 😂”source ↗

meowwentthedino · r/sysadmin · 1 upvotes

“I was never initially involved in anything to do with this project. I primarily deal with incoming calls standard tickets that get sent through email the usual often on again technical support.”source ↗

meowwentthedino · r/sysadmin · 1 upvotes

“The main issue for me is that the scope wasn't initially told to me that I would then be drafted in further to the project”source ↗

“even though I've pushed back and said I don't have the capacity to do this they say oh well we'll just reopen the ticket.”source ↗

meowwentthedino · r/sysadmin · 1 upvotes

Where this came up

People with this problem also raised