Said It Here

Will VCs reject my startup because it's not AI?

Founders building non-AI companies face heavy investor bias and catch-22 situations where traditional commercial loans require licensing they cannot get without upfront reserves. This focus leaves traditional startups unable to secure funding from VCs, incubators, and lenders.

Overview
People affected2 accounts across 2 forums
Workarounds found4 items attempted
Community agreement28 total upvotes

What people tried

Every workaround mentioned in the threads below. We haven’t tested any of them — and nobody here is claiming they worked.

Found another way around this?

Share your steps and trade-offs so fellow engineers don't have to reinvent the wheel. No account required.

  1. 1
    bootstrapping
    Did this help you?
  2. 2
    angel-bootstrapping through personal connections
    Did this help you?
  3. 3
    Structuring deals with capital partners using dual-signature accounts and revenue share
    Did this help you?
  4. 4
    Using a line of credit from a local bank backed by home collateral
    Did this help you?
Tried another approach not listed above?+ Share your workaround ↑

In their words

Unedited, grouped by where they were said, most upvoted first within each place, each linked to the thread it came from.

r/Entrepreneur1 person · September 2026

“I can't get a regular commercial loan on this without licensing, and can't get licensed without the reserves, so catch 22.”source ↗

UnusualAd3207 · r/Entrepreneur · 21 upvotes
Hacker News1 person · September 2026

“I am worried about the attitude of incubators, VCs, and investors in general. Would the lack of AI be a nonstarter for most outside investors?”source ↗

mondobe · Hacker News · 11 upvotes

Where this came up

People with this problem also raised